Judy Foreman

Nationally Sindicated Fitness, Health, and Medicine Columnist

  • HOME
  • Books
  • BIO
  • BLOG
  • COLUMNS
  • Q&A
  • PRESS
  • CONTACT

Column Search

Column Categories

  • General Medicine
  • Women's issues
    • Breast Cancer
    • Hormone replacement
  • Cancer
  • Alternative Medicine
  • Nutrition
  • Exercise/Fitness
  • Heart Disease
  • Aging
  • Pain
  • Dental
  • Allergies
  • Mental Health
    • Depression
    • Alcohol
    • Loneliness/Loss
    • Sleep Problems
    • Anxiety

For The Facts on ‘Natural’ Remedies, Go Online

May 29, 2006 by Judy Foreman

We Americans now spend an estimated $20 billion a year on dietary supplements and so-called “natural” remedies, many of us blissfully — even willfully — ignorant of the actual medicinal value, or utter lack thereof, in of these products.

It’s not entirely our fault that we buy this stuff so blindly. In 1994, Congress limited the power of the US Food and Drug Administration to regulate supplements and herbal medicines, which now are allowed to get — and stay — on the market unless clear evidence of harm is found.

We’ve been left largely to our own devices to figure out which alternative remedies actually work, and are safe, and which are pure snake oil.

Happily, a few reasonably trustworthy websites have sprung up allowing consumers to evaluate how much credible research there is (or isn’t) for a particular supplement,  how the “natural” remedy in question interacts with other such products or with prescription drugs, and what the major side effects are.

(I put “natural” in quotes, by the way, because the term is meaningless for health products. Pills from health food stores are not intrinsically safe, gentle or non-toxic just because they are called “natural.”  And they’re much less likely than prescription drugs to even contain the ingredients listed on the labels.)

To facilitate comparisons among my favorite sites, I’ve tracked how they rate three of the top-selling products: black cohosh, often used to treat hot flashes; Echinacea, used to treat and prevent colds; and the combination of glucosamine-chondroitin, used to ease the pain of osteoarthritis. In truth, it’s hard to tell how solid the science is for these, and many other, alternative remedies, but some sites do a better job than others at pointing out the products’ shortcomings. Some information on these sites is free, but for details, you often have to pay (typically $15 to $50) per year.

For starters, I recommend the site run by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (part of the National Institutes of Health). It is quite helpful and easy to use. To check on echinacea, for instance, go to http://nccam.nih.gov/health/echinacea. The information is succinct, noting that studies show echinacea does not appear to prevent colds or other infections, nor does it shorten the lengths of colds or flu.

For black cohosh, the site says studies are mixed for menopausal relief and notes that it has been linked with liver problems, though the site cautions that it’s not clear if black cohosh is truly to blame. As for glucosamine-chondroitin, the site includes the GAIT study results showing the remedy did not provide significant relief for osteoarthritis patients, except for a small subset of people.

Another of my favorite sites, because it is the most aggressively critical, is www.worstpills.org the creation of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group in Washington, D.C., which takes no money from government or industry and relies on membership fees and product sales. The site is very thorough and put all three of my test supplements in the “Do Not Use” category.

Worstpills.org concludes, for instance, that “there is no significant evidence that black cohosh alleviates menopausal symptoms.” Among adverse effects, it cites two cases in the medical literature of liver transplants possibly linked  to the supplement.

As for echinacea, the site concludes that there is “no convincing evidence” that it reduces the frequency or severity of the common cold.

On glucosamine-chondroitin, www.worstpills.org  includes information from the most recent and most credible study (the so-called GAIT trial, published in February, 2006 in the New England Journal of Medicine) which found a non-commercial form of the combination ineffective except for a subgroup of people with moderate-to-severe pain.

Another good site is www.herbalgram.org  (click on “herbal information”), run by the Texas-based American Botanical Council and its chief guru, Mark Blumenthal. The council gets half its funding from the supplement/herbal industry, and the other half from health professionals and researchers. Despite its industry backing, I find the site thorough, accurate and fairly independent.

On black cohosh, herbalgram.org  put out a special article in March after an Australian government agency warned the substance was linked to liver toxicity. The site goes deep on black cohosh and notes that a leading black cohosh product, Remifemin, now carries a warning label about potential liver toxicity.

On echinacea, herbalgram.org has so much material it’s tough to find a bottom line. It acknowledges the lack of efficacy for treating or preventing colds, but points out that the most recent clinical trial was done with doses that were too low to be effective, Blumenthal said. The group did not evaluate glucosamine-chondroitin because it is not an herbal product.

Consumer Reports is another good site. A few weeks ago, the group added a rating system for “natural” remedies to its website — www.consumerreports.org/mg/natural-medicine/ratings.htm. The massive amount of information in these ratings of 14,000 herbs, vitamins and nutritional supplements comes directly from a respected source used by pharmacists and physicians, the Natural Medicines Comprehensive database, which gets no industry funding and is supported only by subscriptions from physicians and pharmacists.

The Consumer Reports site provides a huge amount of detail about each product and possible interactions with other medications. Despite its vastness, it’s easy to use. It goes easy on black cohosh, calling it “possibly effective” for hot flashes, though it does note possible interactions with drugs like cisplatin, the cancer drug. A “possibly effective” rating means there is some evidence of efficacy and possibly some negative evidence.

The site is also kind to Echinacea and glucosamine-chondroitin, calling them both “possibly effective.” Echinacea, said the database editor, Dr. Phil Gregory in an e-mail, is not effective at all in preventing colds, and is only possibly effective in treating an existing cold. On glucosamine-chondroitin, he said that although the GAIT trial looked at the combination, most research uses glucosamine sulfate alone and that does appear to be effective.

One other government site rates a mention. It’s run by the FDA, and lists dietary supplements the agency has issued safety alerts for (

http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/ds-warn.html) It has issued no such alerts for black cohosh, echinacea or glucosamine-chondroitin.

 My take on all this is that there are probably some useful, safe supplements out there.

But the whole field of dietary and herbal supplements is basically faith-based medicine, so I’m glad there are some websites to check with to make sure while I think I’m doing myself some good, I’m not accidentallly doing harm.

Copyright © 2025 Judy Foreman