Judy Foreman

Nationally Sindicated Fitness, Health, and Medicine Columnist

  • HOME
  • Books
  • BIO
  • BLOG
  • COLUMNS
  • Q&A
  • PRESS
  • CONTACT

Recent Comments

  • Judy Foreman on The Hysteria About Prescription Pain Killers
  • Edenira on Senate Hearing On Sweeping Problem Of ‘Pain in America’
  • sam-e study on Pain Foundation’s Drug Money Was A Shame, But So Is Group’s Demise
  • Samidu on Senate Hearing On Sweeping Problem Of ‘Pain in America’
  • Yanna on The Hysteria About Prescription Pain Killers

Archives

Archives for October 2013

FDA Ruling on Vicodin – Burdens for Pain Patients

October 25, 2013 by Judy Foreman Leave a Comment

In a move designed to combat drug abuse but likely to put further burdens on pain patients, the US Food and Drug Administration yesterday announced that it is recommending tighter controls over opioid pain relievers such as Vicodin and Lortab that contain hydrocodone.

The shift in policy – the subject of a controversial hearing in January, 2013 – will limit the number of refills a patient can get before going back to his or her doctor for a new prescription. It will also mean that a patient must physically take each prescription to a pharmacy, instead of allowing doctors to call the prescription in. For patients in severe, chronic pain and those with physical limitations, these requirements are likely to pose significant difficulties.

In the statement on its website, the FDA said that opioids (narcotics) do allow people living with chronic pain to “manage their pain as well as significantly improve their quality of life.” But the FDA also said it had become “increasingly concerned” in recent years about the “abuse and misuse of opioid products.”

The FDA said that by early December, it would formally submit its recommended changes to the Health and Human Services Department. It added that the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is expected to concur with the new recommendations and that a final decision on the new policy will be made by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), which, in 2009, asked for the change. In bureaucratic language, the change involves moving products that contain hydrocodone in combination with another drug such as acetaminophen from classification as a Schedule III drug to classification as a more restricted Schedule II drug.

In practice, said Cindy Steinberg, a chronic pain patient and National Director for Policy and Advocacy at the US Pain Foundation, a nonprofit advocacy group, the change will impose serious hardships on the 47 million Americans who currently take hydrocodone-containing products.

With hydrocodone-containing products in their current, Schedule III classification, a pain patient can see a doctor once a year, get a prescription with five refills – meaning a supply of the drug for six months – and then call the doctor for another prescription good for another six months, which the doctor can call in to the pharmacy.

Once hydrocodone-containing products are placed in Schedule II, a pain patient would be able to get a supply of the drug for up to three, not six, months at a time. A patient will then have to have another visit with the doctor and physically take each new prescription to the pharmacy. Instead of seeing a doctor just once a year, a patient would have to go to the doctor every three months.

The change is “extremely detrimental” for pain patients, said Steinberg in a telephone interview yesterday, not just in terms of pain control but in terms of the costs of added visits to the doctor and even the ability to get those extra visits in an already-overburdened health care system. Steinberg testified at the FDA’s hearing on the proposed change last January that “rescheduling hydrocodone combination medications is a drastic measure that will have far-reaching negative consequences; chief among them will be loss of pain control for millions of Americans.”

In a telephone interview with the New York Times, Dr. Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA’s center for drug evaluation and research, said the FDA was aware that changing the prescribing rules would affect patients but that the impact on public health caused by abuse of the drugs had reached a tipping point.

Filed Under: Blog

Tylenol’s Key Ingredient Under (More) Scrutiny

October 3, 2013 by Judy Foreman Leave a Comment

Pain relievers are in the news again — and the news isn’t great.

Acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, is the focus of a series of scary investigative articles by ProPublica, the online new organization. The bottom line of the series: about 150 people per year die from accidentally taking too much acetaminophen, and even though the line between a therapeutic dose and a dangerous dose is slim, the FDA (and the drug companies that sell the products) have done little to warn consumers.

To be sure, treating pain with any medication is an intrinsically dicey, though often necessary, business. Opioids can reduce pain, though not entirely, and carry the risk of dependence, immune and hormonal changes and, in some cases, abuse and overdose.

In some ways, acetaminophen is the slipperiest of all the pain medications to understand because it’s not just in over-the-counter medications such as Tylenol, but in a whopping 600 prescription and OTC products, including cough syrup and in combination pain-relievers such as Vicodin, a mix of acetaminophen and hydrocodone. Some chronic pain patients have to limit their use of Vicodin not because of the hydrocodone, an opioid, but because of the risk of getting too much acetaminophen.

That’s why many pain specialists now advocate not giving pain patients combination drugs like Vicodin, but using separate pills – one containing an opioid such as oxycodone and the other, acetaminophen, Dr. Daniel Carr, an anesthesiologist and Director of the Program on Pain Research, Education and Policy at Tufts University School of Medicine, said in an interview. That way, if a patient needs to increase dosage of the opioid, that can be done without increasing acetaminophen as well.

Because acetaminophen, which comes in both prescription and over-the-counter formulations, is in so many products and because consumers often don’t read the fine print, they can ingest far more acetaminophen than they realize, significantly raising the risk of acute liver failure. In fact, lawsuits involving acetaminophen overdoses are on the rise.

Adding to the problem is the fact that acetaminophen has a narrow “therapeutic index,” which means that the dose at which it helps is very close to the dose at which it harms.

Acetaminophen is particularly dangerous in combination with alcohol. “When each of my kids became high school and college age, just because of the prevalence of drinking amongst young people,” said Carr, “I emphasized to each of them that if they are ever drinking and get some symptom like a headache or hangover, to never, ever take Tylenol. Alcohol augments acetaminophen toxicity.”

Even among nondrinkers, Carr said, acetaminophen can be risky if taken in excess. Some older people, he noted, take acetaminophen daily, which can cause them to lose salt through their kidneys and wind up with low sodium concentrations in the blood, a situation that can result in mental status changes that can mimic dementia.

Both the FDA and the maker of Tylenol, McNeil Consumer Healthcare, have been lax in responding to growing safety concerns, according to ProPublica.

In January, 2011, the FDA did tell drug manufacturers to limit the amount of acetaminophen in combined prescription products to 325 milligrams per dose. It also required that a black boxed label be added to prescription acetaminophen products warning of the risk of severe liver injury and allergic reaction. But it did not require OTC acetaminophen to carry such a label, even though some OTC pills contain as much as 500 milligrams of the drug.

The FDA also did make clear that people should not drink alcohol when taking acetaminophen and advised patients not to exceed a total 4,000 milligrams of acetaminophen a day. That 4,000 milligrams a day is “the threshold of toxicity,” said Carr, the point at which serious problems can occur. People who are malnourished or not in good health should be especially cautious about approaching this threshold.

McNeil has now changed its label for Extra Strength Tylenol, recommending a maximum daily dose maximum of 3,000 milligrams, but it has left the recommended maximum at 3.9 grams (3,900 milligrams) for Tylenol Arthritis Pain, an extended release product.

The actual statistics on acetaminophen hospitalizations and deaths are difficult to sort out. This lack of transparency is made clear by the ProPublica series, which analyzed three different sets of data – from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the American Association of Poison Control Centers (a nonprofit group that receives federal funds) to try to figure it out.

Using the CDC figures, ProPublica says that more than 300 people a year die from acetaminophen poisoning, while the FDA pegs the number at 980 deaths. The poison control group puts the number at 113.

For hospitalizations linked to acetaminophen poisoning, ProPublica cites yet another database, which shows about 33,000 people are hospitalized every year for this problem.

Some analyses suggest that more people die every year from acetaminophen poisoning, ProPublica says, than from NSAIDS, but this is a controversial point. (A 1999 study suggested that more than 16,000 deaths occur each year related to NSAIDS, but the lead author of that study emailed ProPublica to say he now thinks that estimate is too high.)

The ProPublica series comes down hard on both the FDA and McNeil. It says that the FDA has been egregiously slow in demanding specific safety changes, such as reducing the allowable daily dose of acetaminophen. The FDA also has failed to take simple steps such as making the 325 milligram dose per pill limit that now pertains to prescription acetaminophen apply to OTC. In a telephone conversation last week, an FDA spokesman said the agency “continues to assess the risks of acetaminophen-containing products” and that this involves a “lengthy process made more challenging by delays encountered as scientific data and advances emerge.”

The FDA has also been particularly slow to act, ProPublica said, on dosing instructions and drug concentrations of acetaminophen for children. Several deaths have been reported because of confusing dosing instructions for children. In 2011 the drug industry itself agreed to market just one concentration of pediatric acetaminophen to make things simpler. The FDA spokesman said the agency held an advisory committee meeting on the pediatric dosing issue in 2011 and is now “considering whether to modify the acetaminophen monograph.”

For its part, a McNeil spokeswoman said last week that the company has made some labeling changes “proactively.” On its website, the company notes that it has changed the labeling on some products.

It all seems unnecessarily confusing. My personal take on acetaminophen? Be really, really careful with dosing. Don’t drink at all if you take acetaminophen. And double check with a pediatrician all dosing for children.

(This post was originally published in WBUR’s CommonHealth blog, 10/01/13)

Filed Under: Blog

Copyright © 2025 Judy Foreman