Judy Foreman

Nationally Sindicated Fitness, Health, and Medicine Columnist

  • HOME
  • Books
  • BIO
  • BLOG
  • COLUMNS
  • Q&A
  • PRESS
  • CONTACT

Recent Comments

  • Judy Foreman on The Hysteria About Prescription Pain Killers
  • Edenira on Senate Hearing On Sweeping Problem Of ‘Pain in America’
  • sam-e study on Pain Foundation’s Drug Money Was A Shame, But So Is Group’s Demise
  • Samidu on Senate Hearing On Sweeping Problem Of ‘Pain in America’
  • Yanna on The Hysteria About Prescription Pain Killers

Archives

Archives for December 2012

Around The World, Living Longer But Not Living Better

December 13, 2012 by Judy Foreman Leave a Comment

A massive new study out today shows that around the world, people are living longer than they did 20 years ago, but there’s a catch: many of these extra years are spent in poor health — in some cases with conditions that might be preventable or treatable.

The collaborative project, published in a special issue of The Lancet and led by researchers at the University of Washington and a consortium including the Harvard School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, found that some of the old scourges of humankind — infectious disease and childhood illnesses — that were once the leading causes of death have decreased dramatically, even in many developing areas. Deaths among children under five used to be the biggest contributor to the world’s health burden; now it’s chronic diseases that cause severe pain, impair mobility or keep people from seeing, hearing and “thinking clearly,” as the university put it in a statement.

But as childhood deaths have decreased, there has been a troubling increase in deaths among young adults, those aged 15 to 49 – mainly because of violence and HIV/AIDS. And while malnutrition – including starvation – used to be the leading risk factor for death worldwide, now it’s the opposite that’s the big threat: poor diets and physical inactivity. In fact, dietary risk factors and physical inactivity now account for a whopping 10 percent of the world’s health burden, as excess weight and high blood sugar continue to soar.

As some health problems have lessened worldwide between the new study, called the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 and its predecessor in 1990, others have soared, chief among them lower back pain and road accidents. The latest research, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, was a massive endeavor with 486 authors from 302 institutions and more than 30,000 survey participants in more than 100 countries. It resulted in seven scientific papers being published together.

In statistical terms, what’s happening is that although life expectancy from birth is still increasing all around the world, what might be called the “healthspan” is not keeping pace. In other words, we are living longer, but some of those “extra” years are years of pain, sickness, immobility, depression, anxiety and other forms of poor health.

Worldwide, life expectancy for men is now 67.5 and for women, 73.3, said Joshua Salomon, lead author of two of the seven studies and a professor of global health at the Harvard School of Public Health. Salomon spoke yesterday by telephone from England.

By contrast with life expectancy, his study found, “health expectancy” for men is only 58.3 years, and for women, 61.8. In other words, for the average man, who will live 67.5 years, the equivalent of 9.2 of the total years will be spent in poor health, counting both small and large losses of health, said Salomon. The average woman can expect the equivalent of 11.5 years of poor health.

“We can expect more years of good health, but also more years in poor health,” Salomon said. On average, the world as a whole loses more years of healthy life to various forms of chronic illness and disability today than 20 years ago. The best rates of health expectancy today, for both men and women, are in Japan, as they were 20 years ago as well.

Among the biggest chronic health issues are mental health problems and musculoskeletal problems, including pain and physical disability. Depression was not even viewed as a public health problem until the first global burden of disease study in 1990. The increasing burden of depression is troubling because mental health problems can often be helped with proper diagnosis and treatment.

Indeed, lower back pain, depression, iron-deficiency anemia and neck pain were the top four “sequelae,” or consequences of disease and injury, responsible for the greatest health loss in terms of the number of years lived with a disability.

From both an individual and a societal perspective, these worldwide shifts in health patterns raise major issues. Among the most important is that health care systems in many countries, including the US, are geared more toward acute than chronic care. We’ve gotten very good at handling life-threatening emergencies but much less good at helping people cope with the grinding burden of mental health problems, chronic pain and other forms of disability.

Salomon put it this way: “We have been more successful at finding ways to address things that are potentially fatal than things that cause chronic loss of health. One of our aims is that this study will raise awareness of this imbalance.”

Filed Under: Blog

The Pill Without A Prescription: It’s Time

December 3, 2012 by Judy Foreman Leave a Comment

Earlier this month, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the country’s leading professional group for ob/gyn physicians, recommended that oral contraceptives — on the market for more than half a century now — finally be available over-the-counter.

It’s about time.

Even emergency contraception — better known as Plan B One Step — has been available over the counter since 2006 for women 18 and older, and subsequently, for women 17 and older.

Contraception, as everybody knows by now, was a hot button political issue this fall. (Haven’t we fought this fight already?) But perhaps, given the election results, the time is finally nigh to come to our collective senses and do as the ob/gyns recommend – make birth control pills available to women of any age, any time, at any pharmacy, no doctor visit or prescription needed.

Just because the ob/gyns have recommended over-the-counter availability of “the pill,” of course, does not mean that it will happen right away. A pharmaceutical company will have to take on the issue and go to the FDA for approval of an over-the-counter pill.

In the new recommendations, the ob/gyn physicians say that after reviewing numerous studies, they concluded that the benefits of making the pill more widely available vastly outweigh the risks. The benefits apply to women individually and to society as a whole.

Half of all U.S. pregnancies are still unintended and many of these lead to abortion. The best way to prevent abortion, obviously, is to prevent conception in the first place.

Admittedly, I do have a few concerns. One is that over-the-counter formulations could, depending on pharmaceutical pricing, be more expensive than the same drug bought with a prescription.

Dr. Kavila Nanda, a member of the committee that wrote the new recommendations, told me that “any plans to make oral contraceptives available over-the-counter need to address the cost issue because we are trying to remove barriers, not make it more expensive.” (Nobody knows yet what effect Obama’s Affordable Care Act will have on this question.)

Another concern — which is shared by the FDA — is that certain birth control pills (such as Yasmin and Yaz) that contain a hormone called drospirenone, similar to the natural body-made progesterone, may increase the risk of blood clots more than other oral contraceptives. The ob/gyn group, which has evaluated studies on the hormone, thinks the risk is “still very low,” Nanda said.

The solution, it seems to me, is to make oral contraceptives available to women of all ages, with lots of package inserts, posters and public education campaigns designed to help women decide if they are appropriate candidates for the pill. First and foremost, women should realize that, while oral contraceptives do protect against pregnancy, they do not protect at all against sexually transmitted diseases.

Women should also know that they should not take oral contraceptives without consulting a doctor if they are breastfeeding, if they are 35 or older and smoke, or if they have certain disorders like high blood pressure or diabetes. Women who have or have had breast cancer or who might currently be pregnant should also absolutely not take oral contraceptives.

So, let’s inform women and girls of these risks and hope that Big Pharma and the FDA will get on board. Soon. Before another generation of young women find themselves having to deal with unintended pregnancies.

Filed Under: Blog

Copyright © 2025 Judy Foreman